This data as json
| day | description | everyone | facilitators | facilitators_twitter | id | length | notepad | room | time | timeblock | title | transcription |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thursday | [Read the notes from this session](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gsjtKEkM7Cx2aA9fknnzN8I1b4WmqWuOKRjyD4iKcvo/edit) It's easier for me to see what The New York Times published in print in 1851 than it is to see what it published digitally in 1996. Why is that? Is any other news website in a better state? Digital publishing moves fast, but as we evolve the form of news online, how can we preserve what we publish in a way that will let the historians of the future understand the evolution of the medium? Is a SoundSlides audio slideshow going to work in any way in 50 years? Or a Brightcove player video? If you do archive a page, has it lost something essential if it's lost the dynamic ad code or personalization features? These are hard questions, but let's try and come together and create a plan for pitching the value of preserving and archiving digital news to others at our organizations, and start creating best practices for doing it. | Albert Sun, Kathleen Hansen | albertsun, khans1 | archiving-news-websites | 75 minutes | y | Ski-U-Mah | 11:45am-1pm | thursday-am-2 | Archiving News Websites for the Long Long Term | y |